Skip to content
PPXLROASTERS
PXL Roasters
  • History
  • Plate XIII · section 13 of 15

    The carbon footprint of a cup

    THE PROCESS IN MOTION

    The pile behind the mill

    Start the scene or choose a stage. The animation simplifies the mechanism; what follows gives the details and the available references.

    The mill gives up the pulp

    At pulping, the cherry is pinched: the bean goes on its way, the pulp falls behind the mill. The same pulp gives three opposite results there, depending on what is done with it.

    Read the stages without animation
    1. The mill gives up the pulpAt pulping, the cherry is pinched: the bean goes on its way, the pulp falls behind the mill. The same pulp gives three opposite results there, depending on what is done with it.
    2. In the open air, the pile emits methaneLeft to ferment in the open air, the pulp emits methane, a greenhouse gas far more powerful than CO₂ over twenty years. The pile is not neutral: it heats up.
    3. In the digester, it dries the coffeeDigested anaerobically in a closed tank, the digester, the same pulp provides a fuel that replaces the wood or gas used for drying. The methane goes into the burner instead of going into the air.
    4. In compost, the nitrogen comes backComposted, it gives back to the plot a nitrogen that will not have to be bought as synthetic fertilizer. Now these fertilizers are the main source of emissions at the farm.
    5. What the cup weighsA conventional arabica consumed in the United Kingdom weighs 15.33 kilos of CO₂ equivalent per kilo of green coffee; under sustainable conditions, 3.51 kilos, 77% less. Brought down to an 18-gram espresso: 0.28 kilo against 0.06. What is at stake in the field weighs more than what is at stake at the counter.

    To remember: putting the pulp to use is one of the main levers of coffee's footprint, and one of the few that bring something in to the producer.

    Read the full article and its sources ↓
    Masonry pit filled with dark red coffee pulp, at the foot of a hedge
    Coffee pulp discarded in a pit after pulping: the pile behind the mill, whose fate weighs on the footprint of the cupLudger001 · CC BY-SA 4.0

    Mark Maslin and Carmen Nab (University College London) quantify the footprint of coffee per kilo of green coffee. A conventional arabica from Brazil or Vietnam, consumed in the United Kingdom, weighs 15.33 kg of CO2 equivalent per kilo of green coffee.

    The same kilo produced under so-called sustainable conditions falls to 3.51 kg, a possible reduction of 77%. These conditions have a precise content: agroforestry, reduced fertilizers, sea freight, solar drying. It is therefore not a label, it is a list of practices.

    Brought down to the cup, on the basis of 18 g of green coffee, the gap is easier to read. A conventional espresso weighs about 0.28 kg of CO2e, a sustainable espresso 0.06 kg.

    Milk changes the order of magnitude. The latte goes to 0.55 kg (0.33 when sustainable), the cappuccino to 0.41 (0.20), the flat white to 0.34 (0.13). When there is any, the milk weighs more than the coffee itself.

    In coffee alone, cultivation dominates, and first of all nitrogen fertilizers, ahead of transport and roasting. Relative to 9.5 billion kilos produced a year, and to a production that these authors see tripling by 2050, the stake is agricultural before it is domestic: what is at stake at the counter weighs less than what is at stake in the field.

    Maslin & Nab (UCL), The Conversation, 01/04/2021

    What links the carbon footprint to the rest of this plate is the pile behind the mill. The same pulp gives three opposite results there, depending on what is done with it.

    Left to ferment in the open air, it emits methane, a greenhouse gas far more powerful than CO2 over twenty years. The pile is not neutral: it heats up.

    Digested anaerobically in a digester, the same pulp provides a fuel that replaces the wood or gas used for drying. The methane then goes into the burner instead of going into the air.

    Composted, it gives back to the plot a nitrogen that will not have to be bought as synthetic fertilizer. Now these fertilizers are the main source of emissions at the farm.

    Putting the by-products to use is therefore not a separate chapter of the coffee footprint. It is one of its main levers, and one of the few that bring something in to the producer.

    ICO 2024, p. 15-16, 57-59; Maslin & Nab 2021; LC ch. 20 reasoning
    © 2026 Marco De Sousa Rosa · PXL RoastersTexts under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · tools: all rights reserved · images: see the provenanceHome · Colophon · Site map