Skip to content
PPXLROASTERS
PXL Roasters
  • History
  • Plate XVII · section 11 of 17

    Taste manufactured by habit

    Entirely typographic advertisement on a blue ground, framed by a rule: it asks the reader whether he wants to save his money and recommends the malt and fig coffee of the house of Joh. F. Schmidt, manufacturer in Appiano and Bolzano.
    Advertisement for Schmidt malt and fig coffeeJoh. F. Schmidt, Eppan and Bolzano · CC BY-SA 4.0

    Marco's book advances a hypothesis and holds it for what it is. Taste is built by exposure: Bourdieu, in La Distinction (1979), describes preference as a habitus embodied so deeply that it seems natural; the work on food acceptance establishes that a new flavor is won by repetition and not by explanation, in dozens of exposures, without a single number holding for all foods and all ages.

    Now what Europeans and Americans of the 19th century drank was a very dark, thick, sometimes viscous liquid, frankly bitter, in bad cases blackish and muddy with a greasy sediment. That is not the description of an adulterated coffee; it is that of what many still call a real coffee. The dark, the thick and the frank bitterness, which the trade attributes to roasting or origin, would come in part from the roots and cereals that took up four fifths of the packet and served as the standard for three or four generations.

    LC ch. 10; Bourdieu, La Distinction, 1979; Walsh 1894, p. 205

    The hypothesis is not a demonstration. No comparative tasting from 1881 exists, and the packet of the day is no longer there to be tasted. Other threads, moreover, braid the same rope: coffees staled by months in a damp hold, roasts pushed dark to cover defects, long and reboiled infusions.

    What makes it defensible is that the preference survived the fraud. Chicory was legalized, then claimed, then loved. It is still sold, pure or in blends, in northern France, Belgium, Louisiana and India. India's FSSAI allows it there up to 49% of roasted ground coffee.

    Ukers wrote it already, without the paradox stopping him. Chicory has botanically and chemically nothing to do with coffee, and its flavor is entirely different. Many drinkers nevertheless prefer their coffee when that foreign flavor has been added.

    Finally, the hypothesis sheds light on old judgments, which one ordinarily reads without asking what they compare against. When Don writes in 1834 that the roasted seeds of Coffea stenophylla are superior to ordinary coffee, one still needs to know what this ordinary coffee is. It is the coffee of this plate, and the bar was not high. See also roasting for the part played by fire in this reference.

    LC ch. 10 and ch. 4; Ukers 1922, p. 404; ICO, ICC-134-1, September 9, 2022; fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicorée_à_café, accessed September 7, 2026
    © 2026 Marco De Sousa Rosa · PXL RoastersTexts under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · tools: all rights reserved · images: see the provenanceHome · Colophon · Site map