Molded fake beans

At the top of the genre, one no longer substitutes one coffee for another; one manufactures the bean. Walsh describes two generations. The first is a dyed plaster-of-Paris bean, coarse, detectable by its weight and its hardness. The second, which he judges far more dangerous, is an artificial bean of wheat flour bound with biscuit dust, glue and molasses, molded to the exact shape of the roasted bean, cleft included, and flavored with caramel or chocolate; in the cup, a blackish, muddy liquid with a greasy residue at the bottom.
It took watching a bean long enough to reproduce its outline, adjusting a paste that takes the cleft and keeps it as it dries, finding a binder that holds up to grinding and an aroma that survives hot water: product design. Ukers still reports occasional cases of molded beans in 1922, and the official method of analysis spots them by their too-perfect regularity of shape. Roasted peas and pieces of chicory mixed into whole-bean coffee, for their part, are sorted by hand and identified under the microscope.
Walsh 1894, p. 205; Ukers 1922, ch. XVII, p. 170-171; LC ch. 10In this plateThe 17 sections
- 01What makes fraud possible
- 02Chicory, from Brunswick to the Continental Blockade
- 03The inventory of substitutes
- 04Dyeing, polishing, sweating: fraud on green coffee
- 05Molded fake beans
- 06Ground coffee: the thousand-pound formula
- 07Glazing and its patents
- 08The chemists: Accum, Hassall, the microscope and the oven
- 09The laws, country by country
- 10The substitute becomes an industry: Postum and the “cereal-fakers”
- 11Taste manufactured by habit
- 12Wartime ersatz: 1914, 1939, 1977
- 13Instant coffee and today's blends
- 14Modern fraud: the species, the origin, the vat
- 15Animal coffees, or rent-seeking on the story
- 16Today's detection tools
- 17Today
The table of contents, with the first sentence of each section