Skip to content
PPXLROASTERS
PXL Roasters
  • History
  • Process

    Deliberate aging

    After drying.

    THE PROCESS IN MOTION

    What does long storage do to the bean?

    Start the scene or choose a stage. The animation simplifies the mechanism; what follows gives the details and the available references.

    Keeping it warm and humid

    Deliberate aging keeps the bean for months or years in warm, humid air, in jute sacks that let water through. This is exactly what Cenicafé advises against for ordinary storage. Nothing is added, nothing is seeded.

    Read the stages without animation
    1. Keeping it warm and humidDeliberate aging keeps the bean for months or years in warm, humid air, in jute sacks that let water through. This is exactly what Cenicafé advises against for ordinary storage. Nothing is added, nothing is seeded.
    2. The seed diesGreen coffee is a living seed. Outside the parchment, it loses its viability in under six months; in parchment, it keeps it for more than a year. The authors of the measurement propose this death as the cause of the flattening of the cup.
    3. Precursors wear out, lipids splitGlutamine falls markedly, glucose and fructose a little: these are the precursors that roasting will turn into aromas. Lipids split into free fatty acids, which then oxidize. Chlorogenic acids, for their part, stay stable: the common explanation for the mildness does not hold.
    4. What can be seen, what can be measuredThe bean becomes lighter and yellower, and the cup score drops from 60 days in the hottest trial. No blind trial compares a deliberately aged lot with its control.

    To remember: aging is measured in losses, viability, precursors, lipids; the profile the trade seeks has not been measured.

    In history: In history: Old Government Java stayed two to three years in godown, the storage warehouse of the Dutch East Indies.

    Read the full article and its sources ↓
    Green coffee warehouse, jute sacks stacked
    Green coffee warehouse, jute sacks stackedField photograph, Baja Verapaz, Guatemala, February 2, 2026, own collection
    FamilyAfter drying
    Also calledaged coffee, matured coffee, Old Government Java, Old Brown Java, oud bruin, vintage coffee, sweated coffee. Not to be confused with past crop and old crop, which designate a coffee that is simply unsold. Nor to be confused with Indian monsooned coffee.

    Where it is practiced

    Java first, and under administrative constraint. Under the Dutch cultivation system, the colonial government bought the crop from the planters. It then kept it two to three years in godown, the depot warehouse of the Indies. The coffee came out “mellow”, softened by age, and this is what was sold under the name Old Government Java. Ukers writes in 1922 that this system has just been abandoned. Planters then sell without waiting, and aging occurs only during the crossing.

    This crossing lasted as long as sail did, and Ukers contradicts himself on its duration. His chapter on markets gives three to four months for sailing ships. His chapter on sea transport gives four to five months from Padang or Batavia, without distinguishing the two ports. The contradiction is not resolved. The last coffee sailing ship to arrive in the United States is the barque Padang, in New York on Christmas Day 1914.

    Ukers also describes what the crossing did to the bean, and the description matters because it explains the sought-after brown. The coffee was loaded still moist, then the hold hatches were sealed until arrival. The cargo sweated and frothed through months of tropical seas. The bean went from light green to dark brown. This brown fetched three to five cents more than a Java that arrived “pale”, that is, light in color.

    Today's trade sells aged lots under Indonesian names, including Old Brown Java and aged Sumatra. No source of rank 1 to 3 read here documents these lots. Neither storage time, nor warehouse conditions, nor volume, nor the date the practice resumed. See GRAY AREA.

    A word on India, because the confusion is constant. The monsooning of the Malabar coast is not aging. An already dry coffee is exposed to the winds laden with the southwest monsoon, in open sheds. The scientific literature gives six to seven weeks of exposure. It is a short, managed rewetting, not a long storage.

    The principle

    Green coffee is a living seed. Deliberate aging consists of keeping it for months or years in warm, humid air, instead of protecting it. Nothing is added, nothing is seeded. Time is left to work, and what time does is measured in losses, not gains.

    Three mechanisms overlap, and they have been measured separately.

    First, the death of the seed. Selmar, Bytof and Knopp stored coffees prepared by the wet, dry and semi-dry routes for two years. Outside the parchment, the fibrous endocarp that wraps the bean beneath the pulp, all the lots lost their viability in under six months. In parchment, they kept it for more than a year. The authors propose this loss of viability as the cause of the flattening of the cup.

    Next, the consumption of aroma precursors. These precursors are the sugars and free amino acids, the ones that roasting will turn into odorous molecules. Selmar measures a significant drop in glutamine and a slight drop in glucose and fructose. These changes do not follow the viability curve. The authors therefore rule out cellular metabolism and post-mortem reactions. They conclude by elimination that slow Maillard reactions, in the dry seed itself, could explain the loss. This is their exit hypothesis, not a direct measurement.

    Finally, the hydrolysis of lipids. The triglycerides of the bean split and release free fatty acids. The lot's fatty acidity rises, and Borém retains it as a marker of degradation because it is simple to assay. These fatty acids then oxidize. Aung tracks this second step through the peroxide value and through thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.

    A received idea falls here. The mildness of aged coffee is often explained by the disappearance of chlorogenic acids. Badmos and Kuhnert followed green coffees for four years under ambient conditions. They find these compounds stable, and more stable than the other constituents of coffee. They degrade by hydrolysis and by oxidation to quinones, but slowly. The common explanation therefore does not hold.

    The sequence

    • Start from a sound, well-dried lot. Cenicafé sets the end of drying at between 10 and 12% bean moisture. Above 12%, it classes storage as inadequate, because molds then have enough free water to grow.
    • Track water activity as much as moisture. Water activity is the share of water actually available to a microorganism, rated from 0 to 1. It is what controls mold growth, and not the moisture content alone.
    • Choose a permeable packaging. This is the decisive point, and it is the reverse of quality practice. Jute, fique and paper let the bean exchange its water with the ambient air. Barrier packaging, polymer or vacuum, serves on the contrary to prevent aging.
    • Keep it warm and humid, that is, exactly what Cenicafé advises against. It regards an unventilated warehouse above 23 °C and 80% relative humidity as inadequate. An aging warehouse is permanently on the wrong side of these two thresholds.
    • Do not count on heat alone to load the bean with water. In the Cenicafé trial, the permeable sacks at Santa Marta, at 28 °C and 80% relative humidity, reach only 12.5% moisture and 0.66 water activity in a year. The same sacks in a cold room, at 11.3 °C and 77% relative humidity, peak at 16.6% and 0.77 at 240 days. Cool, humid air loads the bean more than warm, humid air.
    • Avoid temperature swings. They cause condensation, hence local rewetting, hence mold foci in the middle of an otherwise dry lot. Cenicafé lists rewetting during transport among the causes of ochratoxin A.
    • Let it run for two to three years. This is the only duration backed by a source, that of the godowns of the cultivation system, reported by Ukers.
    • Re-sort and re-polish before sale. Ukers describes this tumbling and scouring at the end of the Robison process, the only artificial maturing process he judges successful.

    What it gives in the cup

    What is measured. In the sources read, there is no blind trial comparing a deliberately aged lot with its own control. What is measured is the degradation of green coffee in storage, and it always goes in the same direction.

    • Cenicafé, 365 days, four sites, eight packagings. At Santa Marta, 28 °C and 80% relative humidity, the total SCA score drops from 60 days, whatever the packaging. In the cold room, the drop comes at 240 days. At Alto de Letras, 10.3 °C and 72% relative humidity, four polymer packagings hold the score for 365 days, but not the fique sacks.
    • Matias and Borém, nine months, natural coffees scored 82 and 84 points at the start. Sweetness, acidity, body and aftertaste all fade. The overall score stays stable in high-barrier packaging.
    • Borém and his co-authors, NMR analysis over eighteen months. The paper sack drops off at six months in cupping, and NMR sees the drift as early as three months. Vacuum and high barrier hold for eighteen months.
    • Borém and his co-authors, twelve months, eight packagings. The jute sack gives the highest fatty acidity and the lowest tasting scores.
    • Zarebska and her co-authors, twelve months, five temperatures. The best result comes from a natural in a GrainPro bag at minus 10 °C. The second comes from a natural in a jute sack at 10 °C. Jute is therefore not bad in itself, it is bad when it is hot.

    What is claimed. The trade credits aged coffee with four things.

    • A collapsed acidity.
    • A thick body.
    • Notes of wood and cedar.
    • Notes of spice and tobacco.

    None of these descriptions is backed by a published trial. The sheet therefore gives them as sales arguments, not as results.

    Ukers, in 1922, is more cautious than today's catalogs. He reports that the trade takes improvement with age for granted, then raises three reservations.

    • Too long a storage develops flavor at the expense of body.
    • A mild coffee at the outset risks, he wonders, becoming insipid with age.
    • Santos, says part of the trade, are better in new crop than in old.

    He concludes that the optimal storage conditions are not known. He even asks what temperature, humidity and ventilation should be kept. They are still not known.

    One last observation troubles the story of the browning bean. In the Cenicafé trial, at Santa Marta, the bean becomes lighter and yellower. Lightness L* goes from 72.5 to a value between 82.0 and 84.6 depending on the packaging. The yellow index b* goes from 11.5 to a value between 17.6 and 19.3. No packaging prevented this drift at that site. Ukers himself speaks of “yellow matured coffee” for coffees long at sea. The brown of the Javas of old therefore came from something else, and Ukers says so: coffee loaded moist and shut in under the hold hatches.

    What goes wrong

    Mold, and behind it ochratoxin A. This mycotoxin is classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans, group 2B of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. In coffee, Cenicafé names mainly Aspergillus ochraceus, common in tropical regions, and Penicillium verrucosum, which is found only in temperate regions. Other Aspergillus species produce it, including A. carbonarius, which recent work holds to be the main producer on canephora cherry.

    The window is known, and it is higher than what is usually read. A. ochraceus grows between 8 and 37 °C, and between 0.76 and 0.99 water activity. Its growth optimum is 24 to 31 °C and 0.95 to 0.99. Ochratoxin A production, for its part, is documented between 0.83 and 0.87, and in some cases near 0.80. Pardo and co-authors, on irradiated green bean, detect no toxin at 0.80 water activity. They detect none either at 10 °C, whatever the water activity. Their production maximum is at 20 °C and 0.99.

    The figures from the Cenicafé trial frame the order of magnitude, and they contradict a widespread intuition. In natural-fiber sacks, water activity at 365 days reaches 0.73 at Alto de Letras, then 0.74 in the cold room as at Chinchiná. The peak of the trial is 0.77, in the cold room at 240 days. At Santa Marta, the hottest site, it stays at 0.65 or 0.66. In polymer packaging, it stays below 0.70 at all four sites. No packaging, at any site, therefore brought the bean into the toxin production zone.

    The risk is not the average regime of a warehouse, it is the local accident. A cold spot, condensation, a punctured tarp, and a pocket of beans on its own goes above 0.83. This reasoning is mine, it is not in the sources. See GRAY AREA.

    Mold was not an accident in the old trade, it was accepted. Ukers writes that part of the cargo molded in the hold. The damage rarely exceeded one or two inches in the mats, that is, two and a half to five centimeters. And a moldy taste, if not too marked, was prized by experts. This last sentence must be read with today's knowledge.

    The only measured analogue is monsooned coffee, which undergoes a much shorter wetting. Ahmad and Magan count there about 10⁸ colony-forming units of bacteria per gram and 10⁵ of fungi, more than on non-monsooned coffees. They give as dominant Aspergillus terreus, A. restrictus and A. ochraceus. Tharappan and Ahmad, on the same practice, find others.

    • Aspergillus niger.
    • A. tamarii.
    • A. candidus.
    • Penicillium species.
    • Absidia heterospora.

    The two studies therefore do not agree on the species. They agree on the conclusion, which is that monsooned coffee carries more spoilage molds, including mycotoxigenic species.

    The other defects.

    • Rancid. It comes from the hydrolysis of lipids and then their oxidation. Fatty acidity rises, and Aung then tracks the peroxide value and the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.
    • Flat and stale. This is the loss of aroma precursors, hence a cup with no highs and no relief.
    • Bleached. Cenicafé counts 93.9% sound beans at the start. After a year in permeable packaging, this rate falls to between 85.3 and 91.8% depending on the site, the most degraded being Chinchiná. Discolored beans reach 7.6 to 9.05% in these same packagings.
    • Condensation in the container. Temperature swings during transport redistribute the remaining water and create wet spots.

    A management risk, finally. Ukers notes that the tied-up capital and storage costs deter roasters from aging their stock. Three years of warehouse is three years of unsold coffee.

    A word on artificial aging, because it sheds light on the rest. Ukers lists the patented processes of his time for shortening storage.

    • Steaming in crates with perforated bottoms, by Ashcroft.
    • Timby's autoclave, alternating between two or three atmospheres and a partial vacuum, between 4 and 38 °C.
    • Treatment with oxygen or ozone after passage through a hot chamber, by Desvignes.
    • Exposure to a magnetic field, by Weitzmann, which Ukers himself judges doubtful.
    • Treatment with nitrogen dioxide gas, by Gram.

    He regards Robison's as the most successful, patented in the United States in 1919 and sold under the name Cultured coffee. The green coffee is washed, then seeded with chosen strains. Ukers names two, “Ochraeceus” and “Aspergillus Wintii”. Incubation lasts six to seven days at 90 °F, or 32 °C, and 85% relative humidity. The coffee then rests about ten days in a silo, then it is tumbled and scoured. The species Ukers names first is the one Cenicafé now designates as the main producer of ochratoxin A in tropical coffee.

    One last thing on the artificial, which says what the brown fashion was worth. New York houses steamed coffees that had arrived by steamship, to imitate the brown of the sailing ships. The authorities of the Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906 opposed this. A federal court ranked the practice among adulterations and misleading labeling. Ukers ties the end of this demand to the disappearance of the coffee sailing ships.

    Benchmarks

    • Old Government Java storage in godown2 to 3 years
    • Premium paid for a “sweated” Java over a “pale” Java3 to 5 cents, unit not specified by Ukers
    • Measured drop in SCA score at 28 °C and 80% relative humidityfrom 60 days
    • Growth of Aspergillus ochraceus8 to 37 °C, water activity of 0.76 to 0.99
    • Ochratoxin A production by this specieswater activity of 0.83 to 0.87, sometimes near 0.80
    • Highest water activity reached in one year in the Cenicafé trial0.77, in the cold room, in natural-fiber sacks
    • Bean moisture at the end of drying according to Cenicafé10 to 12%
    • Warehouse judged inadequate by Cenicaféunventilated, above 23 °C and 80% relative humidity
    • Loss of viability of green coffee in standard storageless than 6 months outside parchment, more than a year in parchment
    • Exposure of Indian monsooned coffee6 to 7 weeks
    Gray areaModern practice is not documented, and it is the main gray area. For an Old Brown Java or an aged Sumatra sold today, no source of rank 1 to 3 read here gives the following four things. - The real length of storage. - The temperature and humidity of the warehouse. - How often the bags are turned. - The volume involved. The only pages that answer these questions are sellers' pages, and they copy one another. The two to three years cited in DEROULE are those of the colonial godowns reported by Ukers in 1922, not those of a contemporary lot. The effect in the cup has never been isolated. No blind trial compares a deliberately aged lot with the same lot kept under storage conditions. All that can be said is that every published trial on green coffee kept warm and humid measures a drop in score. That does not show that the sought-after profile does not exist. It shows that it has not been measured. The mechanism of the drop in perceived acidity remains unexplained. The common explanation, the degradation of chlorogenic acids, is contradicted by the four-year follow-up of Badmos and Kuhnert. What replaces it was not found in this research. Ochratoxin A in commercially aged coffees could not be quantified. The risk is described here by its conditions, water activity and relative humidity, not by assays on real lots. No measurement on deliberately aged coffee was found. Two reference texts could not be consulted for this version. The first is the Codex Alimentarius code of practice on ochratoxin A in coffee, numbered CXC 69-2009. The second is the FAO guide on mold prevention in coffee. Neither their official addresses nor the mirrors tried returned the text. The moisture and water activity thresholds given here therefore come from Cenicafé and the primary literature, not from these two texts. Three figures in circulation were removed for lack of a source. The first is a water activity floor of 0.67 for storage. The second is the rule of 60 and 80% warehouse relative humidity. The third is the duration of twelve to sixteen weeks for Indian monsooning, which two rank 1 sources bring down to six or seven weeks. One deduction is my own and should be read as such. No package in the Cenicafé trial took the bean above 0.77 water activity in a year, so never into the ochratoxin A production window. I conclude that the danger of an aging warehouse is the accidental wet spot and not the average regime. No source read states this conclusion. Three methodological reservations, finally. Ukers is a trade manual of 1922, so a rank 3 source. His trade facts are usable. His chemistry, which speaks of an undefined enzymatic and fungal action, is dated and is not taken up here. He contradicts himself on the length of the crossing, and the contradiction is not settled. Finally, the storage trials cited cover durations from 60 days to four years. None covers the two to three years of a tropical warehouse run on purpose. The extrapolation is mine, it is not in the sources. == The bag that is recommended and the study that says it changes nothing A 2025 book contains an internal contradiction on packaging, within a single paragraph, and it deserves to be pointed out because it matches exactly what this sheet already documents through its own trials. Hackler and Särchen recommend high-barrier bags of the GrainPro type rather than jute, for mold control. Then, in the next sentence, they write that a recent study showed no significant sensory difference between the two. And they add that these bags increase the carbon footprint of the chain, since they are made of plastic where jute is a plant fiber. The recommendation and its refutation therefore sit side by side in the same paragraph, without the authors seeming to notice. The contradiction is less strong than it looks if one distinguishes the two objectives, and this distinction is precisely what their text lacks. Controlling mold and preserving the cup are not the same thing. A water vapor barrier keeps the coffee from taking up moisture again during tropical transport, thus reducing a health risk that plays out on a few exceptional lots; it guarantees nothing about the ordinary drift in taste, which depends mainly on temperature and time. A study that finds no sensory difference therefore does not refute the health argument, and the health argument does not by itself justify a general recommendation. The trials carried by this sheet go the same way and allow some precision. Borém and his coauthors, over twelve months and eight packagings, find that the jute bag gives the highest fatty acidity and the lowest scores, which is a clear gap against jute. Zarebska and her coauthors, over twelve months and five temperatures, obtain their best result with a natural in a GrainPro bag at minus ten degrees, and their second best with a natural in a jute bag at ten degrees. The conclusion this sheet draws from it is the right one and it reconciles everyone: jute is not bad in itself, it is bad when it is hot. In other words, the dominant variable is temperature, and packaging is decisive only when temperature is not. What would allow a verdict is therefore a crossed design, and the absence of that design explains the book's contradiction: as long as packagings are compared without crossing temperature and duration, one obtains, depending on the trial, a clear effect or no effect at all, and both conclusions can be published. This sheet can write that the recommendation of high-barrier bags is grounded in the moisture risk in hot transport, that it is not grounded in a demonstrated sensory gain under temperate conditions, and that its environmental cost is flagged by the very authors who formulate it. == A reminder that protects this sheet from a confusion The same authors write elsewhere that taste changes due to long storage are attributed to excessive aging of the green bean and not to fermentation. That is an important point of vocabulary for a sheet devoted to deliberate aging: what happens in a warehouse comes from lipid oxidation, hydrolysis of chlorogenic acids and slow degradation of aroma precursors, all chemical mechanisms that need no microorganism. Speaking of fermentation about an aged coffee is a category error, and this sheet can now rule it out by citing a source. Sources for this passage: Hackler and Särchen, chapter 4, p. 45 for the recommendation and its refutation; chapter 6, p. 94 for the aging of green beans. Borém and Zarebska trials: sheet 21, REPERES field.
    Selmar D., Bytof G., Knopp S.-E., “The storage of green coffee (Coffea arabica): decrease of viability and changes of potential aroma precursors”, Annals of Botany 101(1):31-38, 2008, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcm277, abstract and results; Gallego C.P., Pabón J., Medina R.D., Osorio V., “Maintenance of the Quality of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Different Packaging and Storage Locations”, International Journal of Food Science 2025:5049217, DOI 10.1155/ijfo/5049217, section 3.1 (site conditions), tables 2 and 3 (moisture and water activity), tables 4 and 6 (L* and b* coordinates), sections 3.4 and 3.5; Puerta Quintero G.I., “Prevenga la ochratoxina A y mantenga la inocuidad y la calidad del café”, Avances Técnicos Cenicafé 317:1-8, 2003, DOI 10.38141/10779/0317, sections on the growth conditions of Aspergillus ochraceus, on the causes of contamination and on good drying and storage practices; Pardo E., Marín S., Ramos A.J., Sanchis V., “Effect of Water Activity and Temperature on Mycelial Growth and Ochratoxin A Production by Isolates of Aspergillus ochraceus on Irradiated Green Coffee Beans”, Journal of Food Protection 68(1):133-138, 2005, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X-68.1.133, abstract; Badmos S., Kuhnert N., “Stability and degradation of chlorogenic acids in green and roasted coffee beans during long-term storage”, Food Research International 220:117031, 2025, DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117031, abstract; Borém F.M., Abreu G.F., Ferreira A.G., Santos M.D.S., Alves T.D.C., Alves A.P.C., “¹H NMR spectroscopy applied to identify chemical aging markers in green coffee (Coffea arabica L.)”, Food Chemistry 405:134667, 2023, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134667, abstract; Borém F.M., Ribeiro F.C., Figueiredo L.P., Giomo G.S., Siqueira V.C., Dias C.A., “Sensory analysis and fatty acid profile of specialty coffees stored in different packages”, Journal of Food Science and Technology 56:4101-4109, 2019, DOI 10.1007/s13197-019-03879-3, abstract; Matias G.C., Borém F.M., Alves A.P.C., Haeberlin L., Santos C.M.D., Andrade E.T., “Impact of initial sensory quality of specialty natural coffee during storage”, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 97:e20241042, 2025, DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202520241042, abstract; Zarebska M. et al., “Comparison of chemical compounds and their influence on the taste of coffee depending on green beans storage conditions”, Scientific Reports 12:2674, 2022, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-06676-9, abstract; Ahmad R., Magan N., “Microfloral contamination and hydrolytic enzyme differences between monsooned and non-monsooned coffees”, Letters in Applied Microbiology 34:279-282, 2002, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01080.x, abstract; Tharappan B., Ahmad R., “Fungal colonization and biochemical changes in coffee beans undergoing monsooning”, Food Chemistry 94(2):247-252, 2006, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.016, abstract; Campos G.A.F., Kruizenga J.G.K.T., Sagu S.T., Schwarz S., Homann T., Taubert A., Rawel H.M., “Effect of the Post-Harvest Processing on Protein Modification in Green Coffee Beans by Phenolic Compounds”, Foods 11(2):159, 2022, DOI 10.3390/foods11020159, introduction (duration of monsooning); Aung M.S., Wongsakul S., Kitazawa H., Kittiwachana S., Saengrayap R., “Application of ATR-FTIR for Green Arabica Bean Shelf-Life Determination in Accelerated Storage”, Foods 13(15):2331, 2024, DOI 10.3390/foods13152331, abstract; Özer H., “Investigation of Ochratoxin A Levels in Commercially Available Turkish Coffee and Risk Assessment”, Toxins 18(2):84, 2026, DOI 10.3390/toxins18020084, discussion, for the reminder of the classification of ochratoxin A in group 2B by the International Agency for Research on Cancer; Ukers W.H., All About Coffee, The Tea and Coffee Trade Journal Company, New York, 1922, chapter on the chemistry of green coffee, sections “aging” et “artificial aging”, chapter on sea transport, section “Java Coffee Ex-Sailing Ships”, chapter on federal regulation, and chapter on markets, entries JAVA, SANTOS and RIOS
    © 2026 Marco De Sousa Rosa · PXL RoastersTexts under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · tools: all rights reserved · images: see the provenanceHome · Colophon · Site map