Skip to content
PPXLROASTERS
PXL Roasters
  • History
  • Process

    The Kenyan washed process and soaking

    The washed process.

    THE PROCESS IN MOTION

    Why does Kenya add a soak?

    Start the scene or choose a stage. The animation simplifies the mechanism; what follows gives the details and the available references.

    Ferment in a tank

    The cherries first pass through a tank of water, where whatever floats is set apart. The disc pulper leaves the parchment covered in mucilage, which is divided into three classes, grades 1, 2 and lights: each ferments in its own tank, at a single speed. Pectin, the cement of this flesh, is broken down, lactic acid bacteria dominate and the pH drops from 6.0 to 6.5 toward 4.0. Published durations diverge: 12 to 24 hours with traders, 24 to 72 in a Kenyan training document.

    Read the stages without animation
    1. Ferment in a tankThe cherries first pass through a tank of water, where whatever floats is set apart. The disc pulper leaves the parchment covered in mucilage, which is divided into three classes, grades 1, 2 and lights: each ferments in its own tank, at a single speed. Pectin, the cement of this flesh, is broken down, lactic acid bacteria dominate and the pH drops from 6.0 to 6.5 toward 4.0. Published durations diverge: 12 to 24 hours with traders, 24 to 72 in a Kenyan training document.
    2. Rinse, ferment a second timeThe coffee is rinsed and stirred. The rinse never carries everything away: a film stays attached, especially in the groove of the bean. A second fermentation of 12 to 24 hours finishes the job, in a cleaner, less sugary bath that acidifies more slowly.
    3. Wash in a channel, countercurrentIn the concrete channel, the paddle pushes the parchment against a trickle of water. The dense beans stay at the head, the light ones slip downstream: the washing grades at the same time as it washes, into fractions P1, P2, P3 and lights.
    4. Soak in clear waterEach fraction goes back, in its own bin, under renewed clear water, for twelve to twenty-four hours: remixing them would undo the grading of the channel. There is no mucilage left to dissolve: it is a soak, not a second fermentation, a deduction that no published monitoring comes to measure. The only controlled trial, in Yunnan, sees the water carry away chlorogenic acids, citric acid, sugars and amino acids.
    5. Skin dry, then dryOn mesh tables, in a layer of at most 1.3 centimeters, the coffee goes from 55 to 45% moisture. A thick layer would make the pile ferment. Raised beds then take it toward 11%, in one to two weeks.

    To remember: The second bath is a soak: no more mucilage, clean and renewed water, and the only controlled trial shows that it tempers and evens out the fermentation that precedes it rather than amplifying it.

    In history: A Kenyan study from the 1960s, attributed to Wootton, is cited as the authority for soaking; it could not be read at first hand.

    Read the full article and its sources ↓
    Stepped concrete basins used for washing and sorting cherries, in front of the estate's sheds.
    Washing basins of a processing station in KenyaDaniel Case · CC BY-SA 4.0
    FamilyThe washed process
    Also calledDouble fermentation, double washing (Kenyan double washing), Kenyan method, triple washing (a commercial name, which counts the rinses and not the fermentations), double soak (a mistaken name, which ranks the soak among the fermentations).

    Where it is practiced

    Kenya, in the village washing stations that the country calls factories. They belong to cooperatives and process the harvest of hundreds or thousands of smallholders. The regions concerned surround Mount Kenya and the Aberdare range: Nyeri, Kirinyaga, Murang'a, Embu, Kiambu, Machakos. Altitude puts the river water at around fifteen to twenty degrees, which slows the whole process. The date at which soaking became the national norm is not established by any document that can be consulted. A Kenyan study from the 1960s, attributed to Wootton, has since been cited in the literature as having shown the benefit of a controlled lengthening of the wet phase. This study could not be read at first hand. The process is now taken up outside Kenya, notably in Colombia and Rwanda, under the name double fermentation.

    The principle

    The Kenyan process separates two operations that the rest of the world confuses. On one side, the dissolution of the mucilage, the layer of sugary flesh stuck to the parchment. On the other, the finishing of the bean, which comes after and has nothing left to dissolve.

    The first fermentation does the dissolving work. Pectin, the cement that holds this flesh together, is broken down enzymatically. The enzymes come from the fruit itself and from the microorganisms settled on the mucilage. Lactic acid bacteria dominate the population and the pH falls from about 6.0 to 6.5 toward 4.0. The mucilage loses its hold and becomes rinsable.

    The intermediate wash carries off what has come loose. It never carries off everything. A residual film stays attached, especially in the groove of the bean. The second fermentation resumes on this remainder, in a cleaner and less acidic bath. This is the mechanical reason for double fermentation. Two short cycles finish the mucilage better than one long cycle, without pushing the mass toward over-fermentation.

    The soak is of a different nature. The washed parchment is put back under clear water, without mucilage, for twelve to twenty-four hours. There is no longer any fermentable substrate in quantity, and the water is renewed. Two documented mechanisms then operate.

    The first is leaching, that is, the passage by diffusion of soluble compounds from the bean into the water. The only controlled trial available measures this loss. A twenty-four-hour soak lowers chlorogenic acids, citric acid, isocitric acid, several amino acids, glucose and fructose.

    The second mechanism is that the bean is alive. The coffee seed continues a germination metabolism during post-harvest processing, as long as it stays moist. Soaking prolongs this moist phase instead of interrupting it by drying.

    The conclusion of this trial goes against the common discourse. Soaking does not amplify fermentation. It tempers it and evens out the quality of the green coffee, whatever the processing that precedes it. It is a leveler, not an enhancer. For a station that receives the harvest of a thousand different gardens, that is precisely the useful function.

    The sequence

    1. Reception and flotation. The delivered cherries pass through a tank of water. What floats is dry, pierced or hollow, and goes into a separate lot. This first sorting by density governs everything else: a hollow cherry does not ferment at the same rate as a full one.

    2. Pulping. Kenyan stations work with the disc pulper, of the McKinnon type according to descriptions in the trade. The disc tears off the skin and pulp and leaves the parchment covered in mucilage.

    3. Pre-grading at the pulper outlet. The coffee is divided into three classes, grades 1, 2 and lights, according to density and size. Each class ferments in its own tank. A tank uniform in density ferments at a single speed, which makes the stopping point decidable.

    4. First fermentation. Published durations diverge, and it must be put that way:

    • 12 to 24 hours with green coffee traders;
    • 24 to 72 hours in a Kenyan training document;
    • 1 to 4 days for the whole fermentation phase according to the institutional source, shorter in hot weather, longer in cold weather.

    What happens during it: breakdown of pectin, drop of pH from about 6.0 to 6.5 toward 4.0, rise of lactic acid bacteria. The stopping point is read on no instrument. It is judged by touch, when the parchment squeaks under the finger instead of slipping.

    5. Intermediate wash and stirring. The coffee is rinsed and stirred to detach the degraded mucilage. This is the first of the two washes that give double washing its name.

    6. Second fermentation, twelve to twenty-four hours. It attacks the residual film that the rinse did not take. The medium is cleaner, the sugar load lower, so acidification is slower. This slowness is the point of the step: it leaves a margin before the defect.

    7. Final wash in a channel. The washing is done in concrete channels. The parchment is pushed with a wooden paddle against a trickle of water. The gesture is a washing and a grading at once. The current carries the light beans downstream, the dense beans stay at the head of the channel. Descriptions in the trade name the resulting fractions:

    • P1, the densest parchment;
    • P2;
    • P3;
    • the lights, often marked PL.

    Each fraction goes into its own soaking tank and dries separately. This is where a good part of the homogeneity of the final lot is decided.

    8. Soaking in clear water, twelve to twenty-four hours. The Kenyan institutional source retains about twelve hours and credits it with a gain in color and taste. The water must be clean and renewed, otherwise the step becomes a fermentation again. What happens during it: leaching of soluble compounds into the water, and continuation of the bean's metabolism, which stays hydrated and alive.

    9. Final rinse and draining. The coffee comes out of the soak at about 55% moisture.

    10. Skin drying, as the English-speaking trade calls it. The parchment is spread on wire-mesh tables, in a layer not exceeding half an inch, or about 1.3 centimeters, and turned often. This phase runs from 55% to 45% moisture. A thick layer at this stage makes the pile ferment and ruins the soak that has just avoided it.

    11. Drying on raised beds to 11% moisture according to the institutional source, 10 to 12% according to a Kenyan training document. Shading in the hot hours and regular turning. Drying takes one to two weeks depending on the weather.

    12. Resting in parchment, then milling and grading of the green coffee by size and density. Only at this point do the marks AA, AB and PB appear, which are size grades and not quality scores.

    What it gives in the cup

    What is measured. A single controlled trial isolates the effect of soaking. It was conducted in Yunnan, China, and not in Kenya. It compares lots with and without a twenty-four-hour soak in clear water, on two starting routes, mechanically removed mucilage or fermentation in parchment. Its results are as follows:

    • drop of chlorogenic acids 4-CQA, 5-CQA, 3,5-diCQA and 4,5-diCQA in the green bean;
    • drop of citric acid and isocitric acid;
    • drop of several amino acids, including arginine, glycine, methionine, isoleucine, aspartic acid and phenylalanine;
    • drop of glucose and fructose, which passed into the water;
    • rise of the overall aromatic intensity in the cup, drop of spicy notes;
    • drop of the total intensity of volatile compounds in most variants.

    The authors conclude that soaking tempers the effects of the fermentation that precedes it and evens out the quality of the green coffee, whatever the route applied before it. The same trial also shows that a lengthened fermentation gives a fruitier and more acidic cup.

    What is claimed, without a published trial. The trade and the specialist press credit soaking with the following effects:

    • it would build the bright acidity characteristic of Kenya;
    • it would eliminate fermentation by-products;
    • it would give cup cleanness and a crisp aftertaste;
    • it would stabilize proteins and lengthen the shelf life of the green coffee.

    None of these four claims has been measured against a control. The first is even contradicted in its direction by the only trial available, which sees citric acid and chlorogenic acids fall under the effect of soaking, and not rise. The fourth rests on no published ageing measurement.

    A note of caution on attribution. The classic Kenyan profile, blackcurrant, citrus and sharp acidity, is also built by the varieties SL 28 and SL 34, by volcanic soils and by altitude. No published trial separates the share of the process from the share of the variety and the terroir.

    What goes wrong

    Over-fermentation remains the main risk of the first tank, especially in hot weather. It produces the defects that the trade calls fermented and stinker. The stinker comes from butyric acid, which smells of rancid butter, and propionic acid, which smells of onion. The Kenyan remedy is double fermentation itself: two short cycles instead of one long one.

    Dirty soaking water is the risk specific to the step, and it is mechanical. If the water is reused, loaded with mucilage or stagnant, the substrate comes back and the population starts up again. The soak then becomes a third fermentation, uncontrolled and unmeasured. The lot takes on sour and earthy notes. This is why the instruction concerns the cleanness of the water and its renewal, and not the duration alone.

    Excessive soaking is a risk of leaching. The only measurement available shows that the water carries off sugars and amino acids, that is, the precursors of the Maillard reaction that will build the aroma at roasting. Prolonging the bath beyond what the finishing requires therefore impoverishes the bean. No trial says where the threshold lies.

    Delay in drying is the next risk, and it is made worse by soaking. The coffee leaves the bath at about 55% moisture and must be skin dried without delay. A rain, a full table or a layer that is too thick leave the pile warm and humid, and fermentation resumes on the drying bed.

    Water consumption is an operating risk. The process chains two fermentations under water, two washes and a soak. It requires an equipped station, an abundant resource and effluent management. This is why it practically does not exist at the scale of an isolated farm.

    Finally, the mixing of the channel fractions is a handling risk. If P1, P2, P3 and the lights go back together into the same tank, the grading achieved by the channel is undone. The lot then dries at different speeds under the same shovel.

    Benchmarks

    • First fermentation12 to 24 h with traders, 24 to 72 h in a Kenyan training document
    • Total length of the fermentation phase1 to 4 days depending on the weather, institutional source
    • Second fermentation12 to 24 h
    • Soaking in clear waterabout 12 h retained by the institutional source, 12 to 24 h in the reported practice
    • pH during fermentationfrom 6.0 to 6.5 at the start, toward 4.0 at the end
    • Moistureabout 55% leaving the soak, 45% at the end of skin drying, 11% at the end of drying
    • Skin drying on tableslayer under half an inch, or about 1.3 cm
    • Parchment fractions leaving the channelP1, P2, P3 and lights, dried separately
    Gray areaNo controlled trial has ever isolated the effect of soaking in Kenya, on Kenyan coffee, in a Kenyan station. This is the central hole of this sheet. The only controlled trial available on soaking was conducted in Yunnan. It concerns a single fermentation, not the Kenyan double fermentation. The water of the bath was not renewed there, contrary to the Kenyan instruction. Its soak lasted twenty-four hours, with no intermediate stage. It therefore gives a direction of effect, not transferable values. Nobody has published a microbial count during a soak. The claim that no fermentation takes place in it is a deduction drawn from the absence of substrate and the renewal of the water. It is not a measurement. A residual population certainly lives there, but its activity is not quantified. The durations of twelve to twenty-four hours per fermentation come from descriptions in the trade, not from a published institutional protocol. The institutional source consulted gives one to four days for the fermentation phase, without splitting it in two, and about twelve hours for the soak. The documentary repository of Kenyan agronomic research did not respond when consulted. The confusion between soaking and a second fermentation is not only a bloggers' error. A Kenyan training document consulted itself presents the twelve-to-twenty-four-hour bath in clear water as the second fermentation. The same document attributes to grading in the channel the production of the AA and AB sizes. Yet these marks are screen sizes, attributed to the milling of the green coffee, well after drying. The vocabulary of the trade is therefore not stabilized, including in the country of origin of the process. Wootton's study, cited everywhere as the scientific authority for soaking, could not be read. It is known here only through one sentence of a review. Neither its protocol, nor its scale, nor its figures have been verified. Three elements of the description come from commercial sources and training documents, not from a verifiable institutional publication. They are the nomenclature P1, P2, P3 and lights, the four separate soaking tanks, and the McKinnon disc pulper. The temperature of the water in Kenyan tanks is almost never published. It is nevertheless the variable that governs the speed of fermentation and therefore the real length of the stages. The quantity of water consumed per kilogram of coffee has not been verified. The figures that circulate vary too much to be taken up. The idea that soaking lengthens the shelf life of the green coffee has been the subject of no published ageing measurement. The respective share of the process, of the varieties SL 28 and SL 34 and of the terroir in the Kenyan profile is established by no published factorial trial. Finally, the date at which double fermentation and soaking became the norm in Kenya could not be fixed. The process is old and institutional, but its documentary birth certificate is missing. == Is soaking a fermentation? Two answers, and no source on either side This sheet ranks the name “double soak” among the mistaken names, on the grounds that it classes the soak among the fermentations whereas it is an immersion in clean water after washing. Kornman writes exactly the opposite, and the disagreement is head-on. He writes that the most common multi-stage fermentation is probably the post-fermentation soak, commonly used in specialty washed coffees of East Africa, sometimes called “double washed”. After the parchment has fermented and been washed, it is kept immersed in clean water for a night or for one to two days. And he adds that scientists have confirmed that there is still microbial activity during this phase, so that the coffee undergoes a slowed second fermentation. The claim is not absurd, and that must be said before discussing it. Clean water at fifteen or twenty degrees, with parchment still loaded with residual sugars and a flora settled for twenty-four hours, is not a sterile medium. The question is therefore not whether something happens there, but whether that something deserves the name fermentation, and this question has two sides. The microbiological side asks for a population that holds or grows and metabolites that accumulate. The practical side asks that this activity change something in the cup, failing which calling the soak a fermentation misleads the buyer about what was done. Both parties lack a source, and that is what makes this disagreement peculiar. The formula “scientists have confirmed” does not say which, and Kornman's booklet carries neither note nor bibliography. For its part, this sheet states explicitly that no protocol published by a Kenyan institution could be consulted, which means that the opposite thesis also rests on a reconstruction and not on an official text. The disagreement therefore concerns a point on which nobody has produced evidence, and it would be dishonest to present it as an error of one of the two camps. What would make it possible to settle the question is a short and inexpensive measurement, and its absence is all the more striking: following the pH, the total population and two or three metabolites, lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, in the water and on the parchment during the twenty-four hours of a soak, with a control of washed parchment drained without immersion. If the population grows and the metabolites accumulate, the word fermentation is justified and this sheet will have to correct itself; if the soak merely rinses and rehydrates, the name “double fermentation” will remain mistaken for Kenyan soaking. This sheet does not settle the matter and reports both readings. Sources for this passage: Kornman, p. 15. Absence of a published Kenyan protocol: sheet 02, field OMBRE, and sheet 03, field SOURCES.
    Zhang S.J., De Bruyn F., Pothakos V., Contreras G.F., Cai Z., Moccand C., Weckx S., De Vuyst L., Influence of Various Processing Parameters on the Microbial Community Dynamics, Metabolomic Profiles, and Cup Quality During Wet Coffee Processing, Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, article 2621, 2019, for the protocol of 24 h soaking in clear water on about 875 kg, the measured drops of chlorogenic acids, organic acids, amino acids and sugars, the sensory effects, the dominance of lactic acid bacteria, the pH drop from 6.0 to 6.5 toward 4.0 and the conclusion that soaking tempers the effects of fermentation and evens out the quality of the green coffee; Bytof G., Knopp S.E., Kramer D., Breitenstein B., Bergervoet J.H.W., Groot S.P.C., Selmar D., Transient Occurrence of Seed Germination Processes during Coffee Post-harvest Treatment, Annals of Botany, 100(1), p. 61 to 66, 2007, for the germination metabolism of the bean during post-harvest processing, the expression of isocitrate lyase and the accumulation of GABA; Selmar D., Bytof G., Knopp S.E., Germination of Coffee Seeds and its Significance for Coffee Quality, Plant Biology, 8(2), p. 260 to 264, 2006, for the same mechanism; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Coffee Post Harvest Handling and Processing in Kenya, annex 5 of document X6939E, for the pre-grading into grades 1, 2 and lights by density and size, the fermentation of 1 to 4 days depending on the weather, the final washing in concrete channels with a wooden paddle against the current, the soaking of about 12 hours given as improving color and taste, the skin drying in a layer under half an inch on mesh tables from 55% to 45% moisture, and the final target of 11% moisture; Pereira G.V.M. and collaborators, Integrated microbial-metabolomic analysis reveals how fermentation contributes to the unique flavor of African Arabica coffee, Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences, 12, article 100344, 2025, for the dominance of Leuconostoc and the accumulation of lactic acid in African washed fermentation, on a Mozambican single-fermentation protocol; Ghosh P., Venkatachalapathy N., Processing and Drying of Coffee, a Review, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 3(12), 2014, for the mention that Wootton, 1966, would have shown the benefit of a controlled lengthening of the wet phase by soaking, and for the reference Wootton A.E., The dry matter loss from parchment and green coffee, 5th International Colloquium on Coffee Chemistry, 1971; training document of a Kenyan coffee school, for the flotation at reception, the first fermentation of 24 to 72 hours, the touch test of the rough parchment, the bath in clear water of 12 to 24 hours presented as a second fermentation, the drying of 1 to 2 weeks and the milling at 10 to 12% moisture; professional training documents and green coffee traders' descriptions consulted for the sequence of a Kenyan station, the McKinnon disc pulper, the fractions P1, P2, P3 and lights leaving the channel, their separate soaking tanks, and the durations of 12 to 24 hours per fermentation.
    © 2026 Marco De Sousa Rosa · PXL RoastersTexts under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · tools: all rights reserved · images: see the provenanceHome · Colophon · Site map